<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Bloomsbury Review Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bloomsbury in Wonderland by vjwilder</title>
		<link>http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=61#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>vjwilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=61#comment-12</guid>
		<description>More, please! (Oliver Twist)

Jump right in, David! Share anything. Tell us a story. Post more posts. This is great!

I used to read The BR on my commute from Boulder to Denver every day and was led to many good books. Then I got a job not far from home; then I couldn&#039;t find the free TBR anywhere. And now I&#039;m finally getting around to sending in some money for a subscription. TBR was better than any other Review I read, far surpassed the NYT and broader than the Women&#039;s Review of Books that I also read at the time.

I&#039;m really looking forward to following this blog.
Verna Wilder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More, please! (Oliver Twist)</p>
<p>Jump right in, David! Share anything. Tell us a story. Post more posts. This is great!</p>
<p>I used to read The BR on my commute from Boulder to Denver every day and was led to many good books. Then I got a job not far from home; then I couldn&#8217;t find the free TBR anywhere. And now I&#8217;m finally getting around to sending in some money for a subscription. TBR was better than any other Review I read, far surpassed the NYT and broader than the Women&#8217;s Review of Books that I also read at the time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really looking forward to following this blog.<br />
Verna Wilder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on E-bookin&#8217; it. by vjwilder</title>
		<link>http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=89#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>vjwilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=89#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading on a Kindle since last Christmas when a friend bought one for me when I took the Luddite position. I love read books - I love the full sensory experience of them (not that I taste them, but, you know . . . ).  And here&#039;s what happened: I read more on the Kindle than I did or do in paper. I love it that I can carry one small, lightweight &quot;thing&quot; and  have all the books I want to read - when I travel, when I move about the house, when I wait in any waiting room. I love my Kindle. And I use it only for fiction and for reading samples of non-fiction books I may want to buy. The only drawback is that I like to write in books, esp. non-fiction.

The Kindle, like a real book, is there for reading - not for surfing the net or answering the phone. You can buy games for a Kindle, but playing them is clunky. The screen is meant to be easy on the eyes, so no more eye strain than you&#039;d get reading a book and much less than you get reading on a computer.

I hope you&#039;ll post more about your experience with the Nook. I&#039;d like to know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading on a Kindle since last Christmas when a friend bought one for me when I took the Luddite position. I love read books &#8211; I love the full sensory experience of them (not that I taste them, but, you know . . . ).  And here&#8217;s what happened: I read more on the Kindle than I did or do in paper. I love it that I can carry one small, lightweight &#8220;thing&#8221; and  have all the books I want to read &#8211; when I travel, when I move about the house, when I wait in any waiting room. I love my Kindle. And I use it only for fiction and for reading samples of non-fiction books I may want to buy. The only drawback is that I like to write in books, esp. non-fiction.</p>
<p>The Kindle, like a real book, is there for reading &#8211; not for surfing the net or answering the phone. You can buy games for a Kindle, but playing them is clunky. The screen is meant to be easy on the eyes, so no more eye strain than you&#8217;d get reading a book and much less than you get reading on a computer.</p>
<p>I hope you&#8217;ll post more about your experience with the Nook. I&#8217;d like to know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bloomsbury at 30[+] by R.K. Dickson, Contributing Editor by Glenda Burnside</title>
		<link>http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=22#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenda Burnside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=22#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I started with Blooms in 1984,and we moved a LOT. But I remember Bannock and that table. At that time, we inserted the magazine into brown envelopes, stapled them, then labeled them--and oh man, it was a labor. So I said: &quot;When mine arrives, I take it out of the envelope, fold it half and put it under my arm to carry it around.&quot; So the new method of simply folding and labeling came about--the method still used.
 
It takes a lazy person to come up with good ideas, and I are one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started with Blooms in 1984,and we moved a LOT. But I remember Bannock and that table. At that time, we inserted the magazine into brown envelopes, stapled them, then labeled them&#8211;and oh man, it was a labor. So I said: &#8220;When mine arrives, I take it out of the envelope, fold it half and put it under my arm to carry it around.&#8221; So the new method of simply folding and labeling came about&#8211;the method still used.</p>
<p>It takes a lazy person to come up with good ideas, and I are one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bloomsbury in Wonderland by Bonnie M</title>
		<link>http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=61#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 22:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=61#comment-4</guid>
		<description>The new website looks super!  A giant leap forward into the digital age.  Congratulations, all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new website looks super!  A giant leap forward into the digital age.  Congratulations, all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bloomsbury in Wonderland by Scott Vickers</title>
		<link>http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=61#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Vickers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=61#comment-3</guid>
		<description>How very exciting, David; you&#039;ve done no harm (rule 1) and much good (rule 2) thus far, and I look forward to any and all future blog entries from you and everyone involved with The Blooms.  Thanks for all you do!  This is one online &quot;family&quot; I will gladly belong to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How very exciting, David; you&#8217;ve done no harm (rule 1) and much good (rule 2) thus far, and I look forward to any and all future blog entries from you and everyone involved with The Blooms.  Thanks for all you do!  This is one online &#8220;family&#8221; I will gladly belong to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bloomsbury in Wonderland by PennieMagee</title>
		<link>http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=61#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>PennieMagee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 22:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloomsburyreview.com/blog/?p=61#comment-2</guid>
		<description>David,  a lovely first post. I can&#039;t wait to read future posts, written by you and by our other equally talented and inspired contributors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,  a lovely first post. I can&#8217;t wait to read future posts, written by you and by our other equally talented and inspired contributors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

